Ohio Sportsman - Your Ohio Hunting and Fishing Resource banner

1 - 5 of 5 Posts

·
Moderator
Joined
·
22,528 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
A few years ago, this seemed like it would never happen, but in 2014 that all changes-and it I like how it will play out. I preferred to have 8 teams, but it is-what it is.

College football will finally have a playoff. Come 2014, the BCS is dead.

A committee of university presidents on Tuesday approved a plan for a four-team playoff put forward by commissioners of the major football conferences.

The new system doesn't go too far, Virginia Tech President Charles W. Steger said.

''It goes just the right amount,'' he said.

The move completes a six-month process for the commissioners, who have been working on a new way to determine a major college football champion after years of griping from fans.

''There were differences of views,'' Steger said. ''I think it would be a serious mistake to assume it was a rubber stamp.''

Instead of simply matching the nation's No. 1 and No. 2 teams in a championship game after the regular season, the way the Bowl Championship Series has done since 1998, the new format will create a pair of national semifinals.

College football fans have been clamoring for a playoff for years, and the BCS has been a constant target for criticism. Lawmakers have railed against it. A political action committee was formed, dedicated to its destruction. The Justice Department looked into whether it broke antitrust laws. Even President Obama said he wanted a playoff.

Now it's a reality.

No. 1 will play No. 4, and No. 2 will play No. 3 on Dec. 31 and Jan. 1. The sites of those games will rotate among the four current BCS bowls - Rose, Orange, Fiesta and Sugar - and two more to be determined.

The winners will advance to the championship on the first Monday in January that is six or more days after the last semifinal. The first championship Monday is set for Jan. 12, 2015.

The site of the title game will move around the way the Super Bowl does, with cities bidding for the right to host.

The teams will be selected by a committee, similar to the way the NCAA basketball tournament field is set. The men's tournament has 68 teams, and 37 at-large bids.

The football committee will have a much tougher task, trying to whittle the field down to four. Among the factors the committee will consider is won-loss record, strength of schedule, head-to-head results and whether a team is a conference champion.

The commissioners want to lock in this format for 12 years with a television partner. The current BCS deal with ESPN runs through the 2013 season. The new format will be presented to potential TV partners in the fall, starting with ESPN.

There are still some details to work out - such as who will be on the committee and what new bowls will be involved in the semifinal rotation - but all the decision-makers are on board.

Lower divisions of college football already have a playoff, but the highest level has always used bowls and polls to determine its champion. Those days are coming to an end.

''By making this change we felt we could enhance the regular season but at the same time provide the fans with the kind of postseason that will contribute to the regular season,'' Southeastern Conference Commissioner Mike Slive said.

http://msn.foxsports.com/collegefoo...o-into-effect-for-2014-season-062612?gt=39002
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,063 Posts
Give it 3 years. They will see how much $$$$ they are raking in and bump it to 8 teams, which is what I'd prefer also
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,269 Posts
Can't wait to watch the meltdown!

The first time an undefeated conference champ SEC/Big Ten/Pac12/Big 12 team gets beat in the semi-final by a team with a loss or two it will turn into meltdown.

Yep, it's worked fine at the lower levels for years.....but IMO neither the fans or universities will be able to handle this well.

I like it and I am for it. I think it encourages the Big Dog conferences to play each other more often in early OOC matchups. It's ok to have a fierce OOC schedule, lose even a couple games (to good teams), and you will still get a shot at playing your way to the title.

I know this.....I've seen teams that were 10-2 that I felt could have beat the BCS champ by the end of the season. Know we may get the chance to find out and I like it.

I prefer Reds idea.....they should go to 8 teams. As I mentioned above, some seasons that #6 or #8 teams is playing lights out by bowl season.

This system can kill your dreams or make you a champion, but nobody can argue with wins & losses on the field.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
7,369 Posts
Give it 3 years. They will see how much $$$$ they are raking in and bump it to 8 teams, which is what I'd prefer also
Exactly. It's not about what is fair to the student athletes, it's about how much green they can rake in. And what is better than 3 big money making games with a 4-team playoff? 7 big money games with an 8-team playoff field! And what's better than 7 big money games with an 8-team playoff? Etc... :nono:

I don't have a problem with 4 teams in a playoff. I think that keeps the regular season very meaningful because 2-loss teams likely won't have much of a shot to get into a playoff. Bump it to 8 teams and I think you start to dilute the field a little too much. Keep it to the elite teams, the best 4, likely to all have records with 1 or 0 losses, and I think the level of play and excitement will be tremendous. Last year, for example, you could have had this for your semifinals:

#1 LSU vs #4 Stanford
#2 Alabama vs #3 Oklahoma St
 
1 - 5 of 5 Posts
Top