OSU is great! [Archive] - Ohio Sportsman.com

View Full Version : OSU is great!

bigcountrysg

09-09-2008, 11:39 PM

U of M RULES! U of M Rules! U of M Rules! U of M Rules! U of M Rules!

http://i296.photobucket.com/albums/mm183/Stephalee_2008/EWWWWW.gif

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EF--ldYIBnM

Redhunter1012

09-10-2008, 06:36 AM

Lol!

jeffmo

09-10-2008, 07:07 AM

looks like the labotomy was a success!!!!!

TheCream

09-10-2008, 07:13 AM

Oh yeah, they're awesome all right. :mischeif:

http://i.ehow.com/images/GlobalPhoto/Articles/2082360/th400pyNWMJu-main_Full.jpg

http://collegeotr.s3.amazonaws.com/images/blogs/d396c3057f459e3358737776c57e23e6.gif

http://media.2theadvocate.com/images/vernon+gholston_121707.jpg

I was there for this one, about 30 rows up from where this photo was taken:

http://www.buckeyecommentary.com/files/ginn.jpg

You know your program is in great shape when ESPN analysts ask: which program is in better shape, Michigan or Notre Dame? Especially when ND almost lost to San Diego State last week at home. :biggrin: :bouncy:

O-H

CritterGitter

09-10-2008, 07:50 AM

I -O

bigcountrysg

09-10-2008, 10:38 AM

I just messin with you all.

Deehntr56

09-10-2008, 11:50 AM

That's right..we are!!!!!:D

Here's a GREAT memory!!!:D

Speakers on and enjoy!!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKXvBwEXGpY

7 of 8 in 2008!!:bouncy: :bouncy:

Deehntr56

09-10-2008, 12:17 PM

Hey..someone help me out here....I'm getting older and it's much harder to see...but man, I just don't see UM in here.....any of you see them???? :biggrin:

Week 2 College Football Power Rankings By CollegeFootballNews.com
Updated: September 9, 2008, 6:40 PM ET

Ohio State may not have looked good in their win over Ohio, but they didn't look bad enough for CFN to remove them from the top spot in their Power Rankings. Let's see how things shake out after Saturday's game at USC. BIGGEST MOVERS
+4
-4

FOX SPORTS CFB POWER RANKINGS RK Team REC PRV High/Low Comment
1 Ohio State 2-0 - 1/1 (W, Ohio 26-14; next game: at USC) The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ...uhhhhhhh, letdown/lookahead or not, that was an awful performance against Ohio. The No. 1 spot is held for one more week as a placeholder.
(W, Ohio 26-14; next game: at USC) The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ...uhhhhhhh, letdown/lookahead or not, that was an awful performance against Ohio. The No. 1 spot is held for one more week as a placeholder. Beat USC and there's no problem. Lose, and then the debate begins.
Team: Home | Stats | Schedule
2 USC 1-0 - 2/3 (Didn't play this week; next game: Ohio State) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... Ohio State looked awful against Ohio and the USC blowout over Virginia keeps seeming more and more complete and devastating a week after.
(Didn't play this week; next game: Ohio State) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... Ohio State looked awful against Ohio and the USC blowout over Virginia keeps seeming more and more complete and devastating a week after. That was an awesome performance. The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ... Virginia stinks. That's not really that great a win considering how bad the ACC is this season and how much the Cavaliers struggled with Richmond in a 16-0 win.
Team: Home | Stats | Schedule
3 Oklahoma 2-0 2 3/5 (W, Cincinnati 52-26; next game: at Washington) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... the offense is working. Blasting Cincinnati is far better than it looks. The Sooner attack showed balance, explosion and the type of firepower to hang with anyone in America.
(W, Cincinnati 52-26; next game: at Washington) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... the offense is working. Blasting Cincinnati is far better than it looks. The Sooner attack showed balance, explosion and the type of firepower to hang with anyone in America. The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ... let's see what the Sooners can do outside of the Oklahoma. This wasn't a consistent road team, and while a win at Washington is likely a given for a team this good, let's see if it's a dominant performance.
Team: Home | Stats | Schedule
4 Georgia 2-0 1 2/4 (W, Central Michigan 56-17; next game: at South Carolina) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... the offense opened things up and played up to its full capability in the win over Central Michigan.
(W, Central Michigan 56-17; next game: at South Carolina) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... the offense opened things up and played up to its full capability in the win over Central Michigan. Being knocked out of the No. 1 spot in the polls is the best thing that could've happened to the Dawgs. The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ... what will the Dawgs do against a real defense? It'll be interesting to see what happens against a fired-up South Carolina defense coming off a tough loss.
Team: Home | Stats | Schedule
5 Florida 2-0 1 4/5 (W, Miami 26-3; next game: at Tennessee, Sept. 20) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... the defense was dominant against Miami. Fine, so it's not like the Canes have Vinny Testaverde and Willis McGahee, but it was still a dominant game from the Gator D that's been under the spotlight after a mediocre 2007.
(W, Miami 26-3; next game: at Tennessee, Sept. 20) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... the defense was dominant against Miami. Fine, so it's not like the Canes have Vinny Testaverde and Willis McGahee, but it was still a dominant game from the Gator D that's been under the spotlight after a mediocre 2007. The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ... uhhhhhh, the running backs? For all the talk about more work for the backs and for all the work given this offseason to the other options, when the offense sputtered it was more of the same: Tebow and Harvin.
Team: Home | Stats | Schedule
6 LSU 1-0 - 6/6 (Game vs. Troy postponed; next game: North Texas) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... the extra time off isn't a bad thing. A rest this early in the season should make the team fully functional for North Texas, and with the bigger games ahead.
(Game vs. Troy postponed; next game: North Texas) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... the extra time off isn't a bad thing. A rest this early in the season should make the team fully functional for North Texas, and with the bigger games ahead. However ... The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ... there was a bit of a distraction this week. Gustav wreaked havoc with the Baton Rouge area and it wasn't like the Tigers got a true week off to rest and relax. It was as stressful as it gets.
Team: Home | Stats | Schedule
7 Missouri 2-0 - 7/7 (W, SE Missouri State 52-3; next game: Nevada) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... the offense looks unbelievable. Sure, SE Missouri State is hardly a fair test for the Tiger attack, but Chase Daniel and the crew got the true equivalent of a preseason game.
(W, SE Missouri State 52-3; next game: Nevada) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... the offense looks unbelievable. Sure, SE Missouri State is hardly a fair test for the Tiger attack, but Chase Daniel and the crew got the true equivalent of a preseason game. The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ... the defense is still a question mark. The secondary will soon be tested, and it'll have to prove it can come through against a top passing game.
Team: Home | Stats | Schedule
8 Texas 2-0 - 8/9 (W, at UTEP 42-13; next game: Arkansas) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... the passing game is finding the weapons. Colt McCoy is getting the time and he's making his receivers better.
(W, at UTEP 42-13; next game: Arkansas) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... the passing game is finding the weapons. Colt McCoy is getting the time and he's making his receivers better. As crazy as this might seem, the Longhorns could be the Big 12's big sleeper for the title. The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ... whoopee. The wins have come against Florida Atlantic and UTEP. If Texas really is good, it blows past a lousy Arkansas team.
Team: Home | Stats | Schedule
9 Wisconsin 2-0 - 9/10 (W, Marshall 51-14; next game: at Fresno State) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... QB Allan Evridge showed up against Marshall. He threw well when he had time, when he was under intense pressure, and everything in between. The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ...
(W, Marshall 51-14; next game: at Fresno State) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... QB Allan Evridge showed up against Marshall. He threw well when he had time, when he was under intense pressure, and everything in between. The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ... the Badgers turned it on against Akron and Marshall, but it took a while to get the machine going. If they struggle early against Fresno State, it'll be uh-oh time.
Team: Home | Stats | Schedule
10 Auburn 2-0 2 10/14 (W, Southern Miss 27-13; next game: at Mississippi State) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... the run defense has been unbelievable. Stopping UL Lafayette is one thing, but keeping Southern Miss star Damion Fletcher under wraps is another.
(W, Southern Miss 27-13; next game: at Mississippi State) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... the run defense has been unbelievable. Stopping UL Lafayette is one thing, but keeping Southern Miss star Damion Fletcher under wraps is another. The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ... the offense isn't quite humming on all cylinders. It was fine, but there were a few balls on the turf against Southern Miss and not enough consistency.
Team: Home | Stats | Schedule
11 Oregon 2-0 2 11/15 (W, Utah State 66-24; next game: at Purdue) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... everything is working. It doesn't matter who the Ducks plug in, the offense hums. This is a deep attack with several great options.
(W, Utah State 66-24; next game: at Purdue) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... everything is working. It doesn't matter who the Ducks plug in, the offense hums. This is a deep attack with several great options. The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ... the offensive explosions have come against a miserable Washington State and a lousy Utah State. If the Ducks are the real deal, they waltz out of West Lafayette with a double-digit win.
Team: Home | Stats | Schedule
12 California 2-0 2 12/20 (W, at Washington State 66-3; next game: at Maryland) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... the offense has been phenomenal. Yeah, Washington State stinks, but the Michigan State win is going to look better and better as the year goes on. The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ...
(W, at Washington State 66-3; next game: at Maryland) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... the offense has been phenomenal. Yeah, Washington State stinks, but the Michigan State win is going to look better and better as the year goes on. The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ... the Bears are relying on relatively untested players to shine on offense. They're playing well, but will the consistency be there? Blowing up Maryland might not even prove much considering how bad the Terps are.
Team: Home | Stats | Schedule
13 Penn State 2-0 4 13/17 (W, Oregon State 45-14; next game: at Syracuse) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... the suspensions didn't matter. The run defense stuffed Oregon State, while the offense was flawless.
(W, Oregon State 45-14; next game: at Syracuse) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... the suspensions didn't matter. The run defense stuffed Oregon State, while the offense was flawless. The Beavers might be reeling, but it was still as tight a game as the Nittany Lions could ask for. The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ... Coastal Carolina and Oregon State. Everything is working, but the test hasn't come yet. It won't happen at Syracuse, either. Penn State is playing like a top ten team, but it's still an unknown.
Team: Home | Stats | Schedule
14 Texas Tech 2-0 4 10/14 (W, at Nevada 35-19; next game: SMU) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... the win at Nevada is strong. That's a good Wolf Pack team that's going to challenge for the WAC title, and while everything didn't work perfectly, it was still a double-digit road win. The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ...
(W, at Nevada 35-19; next game: SMU) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... the win at Nevada is strong. That's a good Wolf Pack team that's going to challenge for the WAC title, and while everything didn't work perfectly, it was still a double-digit road win. The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ... the Red Raiders were way too reliant on the big play against Nevada. There wasn't much in the way of consistency, and while it's not a bad thing to get an 82-yard Michael Crabtree touchdown and a 86-yard Eric Morris punt return for a score, it's not good for Graham Harrell to have an off-game so early on.
Team: Home | Stats | Schedule
15 Alabama 2-0 - /15 (W, Tulane 20-6; next game: Western Kentucky) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... Clemson really is good. Really. That win should carry the Tide in the reputation department for a long time.
(W, Tulane 20-6; next game: Western Kentucky) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... Clemson really is good. Really. That win should carry the Tide in the reputation department for a long time. When the Tide is jacked up, it showed it could beat anyone, but ... The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ... the fire didn't appear to be there against Tulane and the offense stunk. The team went through the motions and won, but there has to be some consistency that won't be there for a young team.
Team: Home | Stats | Schedule
16 Kansas 2-0 - 16/16 (W, Louisiana Tech 29-0; next game: at South Florida) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... they're doing it again. Louisiana Tech is a veteran, good team and Kansas ripped through it without much problem.
(W, Louisiana Tech 29-0; next game: at South Florida) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... they're doing it again. Louisiana Tech is a veteran, good team and Kansas ripped through it without much problem. This might not be the juggernaut of last year, but 29-0 is 29-0. The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ... now we'll know. Beating FIU and Louisiana Tech won't matter if the Jayhawks lose to South Florida. The nationally televised game will be for respect.
Team: Home | Stats | Schedule
17 East Carolina 2-0 - /17 (W, West Virginia 24-3; next game: at Tulane) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... there's a very good chance Virginia Tech and West Virginia will win their respective conferences and be in the BCS.
(W, West Virginia 24-3; next game: at Tulane) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... there's a very good chance Virginia Tech and West Virginia will win their respective conferences and be in the BCS. ECU is only going to be better with more and more confidence. The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ... it shouldn't be. The wins over the Hokies and Mountaineers are more impressive than anything anyone else has done so far.
Team: Home | Stats | Schedule
18 Arizona State 2-0 - /18 (W, Stanford 41-15; next game: UNLV) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... the offense is working ... again. Stanford showed against Oregon State that it has a dangerous offense and a good enough team overall to make some Pac-10 noise, and the Sun Devils won without a problem. The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ...
(W, Stanford 41-15; next game: UNLV) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... the offense is working ... again. Stanford showed against Oregon State that it has a dangerous offense and a good enough team overall to make some Pac-10 noise, and the Sun Devils won without a problem. The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ... the Sun Devils did this last year. Beating the mediocre is nice, but eventually a win will have to come against a player.
Team: Home | Stats | Schedule
19 UCLA 1-0 2 /21 UCLA (Didn't play this week; next game: at BYU) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... Tennessee should be in the SEC title hunt all season long. It could be argued that no one has a better win so far than UCLA's shocker over the Vols. The Ranking Should Be Lower Because .....
UCLA (Didn't play this week; next game: at BYU) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... Tennessee should be in the SEC title hunt all season long. It could be argued that no one has a better win so far than UCLA's shocker over the Vols. The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ..... how much of that was for real? Will we get the first half Kevin Craft against BYU or the fourth quarter Kevin Craft? The date in Provo is prove-it time.
Team: Home | Stats | Schedule
20 Tennessee 0-1 2 12/22 (Didn't play this week; next game: UAB) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... the Vols will only be better as the season goes on. The loss to UCLA came in a charged up atmosphere when the Bruin coaching staff pitched a perfect second half.
(Didn't play this week; next game: UAB) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... the Vols will only be better as the season goes on. The loss to UCLA came in a charged up atmosphere when the Bruin coaching staff pitched a perfect second half. This really is a top-ten caliber Tennessee squad. The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ... it shouldn't be. At the moment, UCLA can't be ranked too much higher, and technically, Tennessee can't be ranked higher than UCLA.
Team: Home | Stats | Schedule
21 South Florida 2-0 1 20/23 (W, at UCF 31-24 OT; next game: Kansas) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... this might be the type of quirky athletic team that comes out and blasts good teams when the proper motivation is there.
(W, at UCF 31-24 OT; next game: Kansas) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... this might be the type of quirky athletic team that comes out and blasts good teams when the proper motivation is there. Despite the clunker of a game in the overtime win over UCF, the Bulls might be a whole bunch better and could show it against Kansas. The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ... flaky. Yeah, South Florida seems like it can beat anyone on the right day, but it also could lose to a mediocre team if the wind is blowing the wrong way. USF didn't take the game seriously, at least it seemed that way, UCF did, and there was almost a big upset.
Team: Home | Stats | Schedule
22 Illinois 1-1 3 19/25 (W, Eastern Illinois 47-21; next game: UL Lafayette) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... oh yeah, the running game. The Illini showed it could run the ball like last year against Eastern Illinois.
(W, Eastern Illinois 47-21; next game: UL Lafayette) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... oh yeah, the running game. The Illini showed it could run the ball like last year against Eastern Illinois. Of course ... The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ... it was Eastern Illinois. The team has become way too reliant on Juice Williams. He was the offense throwing the ball against Missouri, and running it against EIU. The defense needs to get better in a hurry.
Team: Home | Stats | Schedule
23 Utah 2-0 - /23 (W, UNLV 42-21; next game: at Utah State) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... it was a letdown game against UNLV and the Utes regrouped and made it a rout. It took a little while but after beating Michigan, Utah still got the job done. The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ...
(W, UNLV 42-21; next game: at Utah State) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... it was a letdown game against UNLV and the Utes regrouped and made it a rout. It took a little while but after beating Michigan, Utah still got the job done. The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ... Michigan isn't very good and it took too long to put away UNLV. You can only beat who's on the schedule, but the Utes might not be a finished product yet.
Team: Home | Stats | Schedule
24 Clemson 1-1 - 8/24 (W, Citadel 45-17; next game: NC State) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... the offense showed what it can do against Citadel. The running game was working well and the team looked like the one everyone has been expecting. The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ...
(W, Citadel 45-17; next game: NC State) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... the offense showed what it can do against Citadel. The running game was working well and the team looked like the one everyone has been expecting. The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ... it was a good win over Citadel, but it was against Citadel. It's going to be a while before the Tigers get their street cred back.
Team: Home | Stats | Schedule
25 Georgia Tech 2-0 - /25 (W, at Boston College 19-16; next game: at Virginia Tech) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... beating Boston College at BC is better than it looks. It was an awful matchup against the good Eagle run defense, and the Yellow Jackets still found a way to win. The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ...
(W, at Boston College 19-16; next game: at Virginia Tech) The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... beating Boston College at BC is better than it looks.

rgecko23

09-10-2008, 12:27 PM

yup just checked again..........still at the bottom of the barrel

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/rankingsindex

GO BUCKS!!!

Deehntr56

09-10-2008, 02:20 PM

:biggrin: :biggrin: :biggrin:

I just found this too.....

http://msn.foxsports.com/cfb/pgStory?contentId=8541436&MSNHPHMA#sport=COLLEGE%20FOOTBALL&photo=8541104

Redhunter1012

09-10-2008, 03:44 PM

Deehntr56

09-10-2008, 04:58 PM

Memories....:biggrin:

http://www.skylinepictures.com/Ohio_Buckeyes_o107_small.jpg

Deehntr56

09-10-2008, 05:03 PM

One of my "All Time" Favs......:biggrin:

Hmmmmmmmmm, I wonder who started this:whistle: ....and didn't realize the Buckeyes really.....really enjoy responding!!!!:yikes:

http://bp1.blogger.com/_gHAScKbrhmM/RzxoV61UVLI/AAAAAAAAAE0/PGNxCbyupMo/s400/priceless%2520-%2520Michigan%2520vs%2520Ohio%2520State.jpg

Sooooooo Buckeye fans....what "else" would you like to say to our UM fan? :biggrin:

jeffmo

09-10-2008, 08:40 PM

That's all right BigCountry. Just ask them about Tressell getting Youngstown State put on Probation for a lack of institutional control because he introduced Shady criminals to his star players then they paid them. After I showed them the proof of this, all I heard back was 1 of them whining and puffing out his chest cause I won't bet him 100 bucks on this years game. And the other one won't even respond to anything from me cause he says I'm outta control!:whistle:

take it to the bank,Mr. "one of them" didn't need to puff his chest out then or now!
i simply pointed out that you had no room to knock tressel with michigan putting that choir boy rich on the payroll.now you point out how good usc is compared to osu.well,at least you're behind a good program now. go utes!!!!!
btw,get it right! it wasn't just this years game,it was for the next 10 years and all WE HEARD WAS CRICKETS!!!!
if you're gonna whine do it right!

Deehntr56

09-10-2008, 09:24 PM

take it to the bank,Mr. "one of them" didn't need to puff his chest out then or now!
i simply pointed out that you had no room to knock tressel with michigan putting that choir boy rich on the payroll.now you point out how good usc is compared to osu.well,at least you're behind a good program now. go utes!!!!!
btw,get it right! it wasn't just this years game,it was for the next 10 years and all WE HEARD WAS CRICKETS!!!!
if you're gonna whine do it right!

Whining and doing it right is important!!!!:biggrin: :biggrin:

If you don't do it right...everyone just gives you some cheese to go with that whine and sits you in the corner letting you play pocket pool, with everyone not knowing who won!:biggrin:

jeffmo

09-10-2008, 09:43 PM

an imitation........

alright you guys,michigan is better than ohio sta.......................wait a minute....................we did WHAT against utah??
oh.............never mind..........alright you guys,usc is better than ohio stat.........wait a minute.....oh,hell!.......they haven't played yet! but it's okay i just remembered ALL michigan fans have to have more than 1 favorite team these days.but you guys just wait........we're gonna be good again............................................. ....some day!!!

:bouncy: :bouncy: :bouncy: :bouncy: :bouncy: :bouncy: :bouncy:

Redhunter1012

09-10-2008, 10:28 PM

who has more than 1 favorite? I was pointing out that USC has more talent on paper. Doesn't mean they'll win. You guys are the ones too Chickens**t to stnd up and say your team will kick USC's butt. You guyss are already making excuses just because 1 bad game against OU. Jeff, I wouldn't make a 10 year bet with a person your age. You can't be taken serious when you wanna put up a thousand dollars can you? I offered a pretty good lighthearted bet to start wit at first and Dee even accepted it. But then big, badass you had to talk louder than everyone else and bring up a $100 bet. Now it's funny just sitting here watching you say the dumbest crap and your buttbuddy Dee encouraging you. I honestly can't remeber you bringing any real insightful info to any of the conversations. The least you could do is be like Dee and join a Buckeye website so you can bring something and not look completely stupid. Now I'll just sit back and wait till tomorrow to see your lame response with something pasted from Bucknuts. Oh wait, that's Dee that paste's all that:rolleyes:

jeffmo

09-10-2008, 11:00 PM

well according to what i read here:

http://collegefootball.rivals.com/viewCFSE.asp
usc had 1 higher rated player,their qb.look up jenkins,laurenitus,and wells.
i haven't made any excuses or been chicken about anything.i've said that it will be a very good game and that the difference will/may come down to special teams and field position.these are 2 VERY closely matched teams.only a fool would say otherwise.do i hope osu wins? well sure! i hope they go out there and wail on usc but i don't believe that will happen.i don't see how that's making excuses.
btw,yes i can be serious!!i've made far larger wages in the past.
and what does age have to do with it?
oh yeah,the bucknuts owner is from my hometown so there is a little info. shared.

Deehntr56

09-11-2008, 12:01 PM

rgecko23

09-11-2008, 12:54 PM

jeffmo

09-11-2008, 05:20 PM

Deehntr56

09-11-2008, 05:41 PM

Sounds good to me!:biggrin:

Redhunter1012

09-11-2008, 09:06 PM

Michigan fans dont have sh** to talk about this year so they want to jump on the bandwagon of every team THE Ohio State University plays. Typical fans up north. Dont be upset that we TRUE fans fignt and raise hell for our team at every chance we get. you dont like the responses you get from Ohio State fans........go argue and boast about it on another states forums.

Not upset. I'm rather amused by it all:) I didn't jump anyones bandwagon. In my perfect world, an earthquake would strike L.A. and both teams would float out to sea never to be heard from again. And yea, I'm just the same as every one of you Sucknut fans, I hope your team loses every week like you do mine. As far as being a true fan, i'm about as educated and passionate about my team as anybody could be. And Dee, go ahead and brag about how much you can wager on games. I'm sorry I'm not 100 years old like you guys and on medicaid. I do have to live the real life and have many bills to pay along with putting my wife through RN schooling. I'm sure you old dudes were there once and can appreciate that. Otherwise I'd love to make a little larger wager. Although I'm not delusional enough to bet $100 straight up on OSU/UM.

jeffmo

09-11-2008, 09:36 PM

In my perfect world, an earthquake would strike L.A. and both teams would float out to sea never to be heard from again.

Otherwise I'd love to make a little larger wager. Although I'm not delusional enough to bet $100 straight up on OSU/UM.

well,the results of that earthquake would surely be the only way michigan could rise in the polls!

and don't sell yourself short,.........................you're very delusional.:biggrin:

Deehntr56

09-11-2008, 09:48 PM

well,the results of that earthquake would surely be the only way michigan could rise in the polls!

and don't sell yourself short,.........................you're very delusional.:biggrin:

LMAO!!!:biggrin: :biggrin:

Eyeslayer

09-12-2008, 05:10 PM

coonskinner

09-14-2008, 07:49 PM

:confused:

Redhunter1012

09-15-2008, 06:34 AM

Way too much bickering here. Does seem like we are ganging up on Redhunter a little bit here. Have to understand it will happen on an Ohio site. Doesn't seem to bother him though, he keeps giving it as much as he gets, maybe even a bit more.

It's OK. I'm pretty sure none of us lose any sleep over this here. I have my team to do that for me:nono: